Test result:
Dan‑isoFIT provides significantly lower surface temperatures and thus
less energy loss than mineral wool on irregular components.
Get all the measurements, pictures and details that show the difference between Dan-isoFIT and mineral wool.
In industrial plants and district heating systems, components such as dirt collectors, valves and flanges are often poorly insulated – even though they are some of the largest sources of heat loss.
We have therefore carried out a comparative test on a DN 200 dirt collector insulated with traditional mineral wool and with our Dan-isoFIT solution. The result shows a significantly lower surface temperature and thus less energy loss, when using Dan-isoFIT.
What do the temperature measurements show?
The measurements document that the surface temperature of the mineral wool insulated dirt collector is significantly higher than that of the one insulated with Dan-isoFIT.
The lower surface temperature means less heat radiation, which results in a lower overall energy loss from the component.
Advantages of Dan-isoFIT on irregular components:
- Reduced energy loss at critical points such as dirt collectors, valves and flanges.
- Better operating economy due to less heat loss over time.
- Form-retaining PUR/PIR ensures stable insulation performance and minimizes the risk of settlement.
- Lower surface temperature improves safety around the facility.
- Easy to adapt to complex geometries, where traditional mineral wool typically insulates less well.
We are happy to help you assess the potential for energy savings on your pipes and components.
